Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Busch v. Wal Mart

April 28, 2006

CARRIE L. BUSCH, RESPONDENT,
v.
WAL MART, AND CLAIMS MGMT., INC., RELATORS, AND MAYO FOUNDATION, MANKATO CLINIC LTD., MANKATO CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, MANKATO ANESTHESIA ASSOCIATES, LTD., WAL MART CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION, AND ORTHOPAEDIC & FRACTURE CLINIC, P.A., INTERVENORS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Helen M. Meyer Associate Justice

Considered and decided by the court en banc.

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed December 22, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

20060428

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.