UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
April 11, 2013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF,
JOSE NUNEZ‐MEDINA, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Michael J. Davis Chief Judge United States District Court
This matter is before the Court on Defendant's motion to exclude hearsay evidence. (Doc. No. 90.) Defendant seeks to preclude the government from introducing hearsay statements concerning the initiation of the investigation of this matter, and to preclude the government from introducing hearsay evidence from his co‐defendant.
In response, the government asserts it will use questions that do not call for hearsay when questioning witnesses as to why the police went to the hotel on August 11, 2012. Further, the government agrees that statements by the co‐ defendant are not admissible as co‐conspirator statements.
As the government does not contest Defendant's motion, the same will be granted.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Exclude Hearsay Evidence [Doc. No. 90] is GRANTED.
Michael J. Davis
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.