Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Williams v. U.S. Bank National Association Nd

United States District Court, Eighth Circuit

August 29, 2013

Helen Williams, Plaintiff,
v.
U.S. Bank National Association ND, U.S. Bancorp, ABC Corporation, John Doe and Mary Roe, Defendants.

Jeffrey H. Olson, Esq., counsel for plaintiff.

Kristine K. Nogosek, Esq. and Stein & Moore, PA, counsel for defendants.

ORDER

DAVID S. DOTY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court upon the request by plaintiff Helen Williams to file a motion to reconsider the court's August 9, 2013, order dismissing the matter for failure to prosecute.[1] Specifically, Williams argues that "[i]t was a lack of attention and lack of response by the Plaintiff to this point that was the basis of the Court's Order... that dismissed the claims of Plaintiff for lack of prosecution." ECF No. 32.

Motions to reconsider require the express permission of the court and will be granted only upon a showing of "compelling circumstances." D. Minn. LR 7.1(j). A motion to reconsider, however, should not be employed to relitigate old issues but rather to "afford an opportunity for relief in extraordinary circumstances." Dale & Selby Superette & Deli v. U.S. Dep't of Agric. , 838 F.Supp. 1346, 1348 (D. Minn. 1993). The court has reviewed the request and the August 9, 2013, order of the court and finds that no such compelling circumstances are present. As a result, reconsideration is not warranted. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request for permission to file a motion to reconsider [ECF No. 32] is denied.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.