United States District Court, D. Minnesota
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
LEO I. BRISBOIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge upon the routine supervision of cases and upon an assignment made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A).
William Kevin Weaver ("Plaintiff") commenced this action on August 26, 2013, naming as Defendants Wisconsin Central, Ltd. (both individually and as successor in interest to Duluth Missable and Iron Range Railway Company) ("Defendant Wisconsin Central"), Illinois Central Railroad Company ("Defendant Illinois Central"), CN Transportation Limited ("Defendant CN"), and Wisconsin Central Transportation Limited ("Defendant Wisconsin Central Transportation"). [Docket No. 1]. Defendant Wisconsin Central filed its Answer on October 25, 2013. [Docket No. 7].
However, it has now been more than 120 days since Plaintiff filed his Complaint, and Plaintiff has not provided proof that he has served a copy of the summons and complaint on Defendants Illinois Central, CN, or Wisconsin Central Transportation (collectively, the "unserved Defendants"). See Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 4(m) ("If a defendant is not served within 120 days after the complaint is filed, the court-on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff- must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time.").
On December 27, 2013, this Court instructed Plaintiff that he was required to "provide proof of service or show good cause for an extension of time to serve" the unserved Defendants within twenty (20) days of the Court's Order. ([Docket No. 10], at 2). Additionally, the Court gave notice to Plaintiff that "[i]f Plaintiff fails to comply with these directives, the undersigned will recommend that any Defendant for whom proof of service has not been provided be dismissed for failure to effect proper service and failure to prosecute." (Id.).
As of today's date, more than 20 days have passed since the Court issued its Order, and Plaintiff still has neither provided proof of service on the unserved Defendants, nor provided good cause why this Court should grant him an extension of time to do so.
Therefore, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 4(m), the Court recommends that this action be dismissed for failure to effect proper service and failure to prosecute unless Plaintiff, within the 14-day deadline to object to this Report and Recommendation, can provide proof of service or show good cause for an extension of time to serve the unserved Defendants.
Based upon the above, and upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that, with regard to Defendants Illinois Central Railroad Company, CN Transportation Limited, and Wisconsin Central Transportation Limited, Plaintiff's Complaint, [Docket No. 1], be DISMISSED without prejudice, for failure to effect service and for lack of prosecution, unless Plaintiff, within the 14-day deadline to object to this Report ...