Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. v. Arctic Cat Inc.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota

November 4, 2014

Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. and BRP U.S., Inc. Plaintiffs,
v.
Arctic Cat Inc. and Arctic Cat Sales Inc., Defendants.

Harry C. Marcus, Robert K. Goethals and Joseph A. Farco, Locke Lord LLP and Kevin D. Conneely, Stinson Leonard Street LLP, Counsel for Plaintiff.

Annamarie A. Daley, Niall A. MacLeod and Emily Grande Stearns, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Counsel for Defendants.

ORDER

MICHAEL J. DAVIS, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendants' objection to Magistrate Judge Leo Brisbois' characterization of Defendants' evidence as to "testing" as "misleading" in the Order dated September 24, 2014. [Doc. No. 361] Defendants do not object to any of the Magistrate Judge's rulings in said Order.

The Court must modify or set aside any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Order found to be clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(A); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a); Local Rule 72.2(a). Based on a review of the record and the submissions of the parties, the Court will affirm the Magistrate Judge's Order in its entirety.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Order dated September 24, 2014 [Docket No. 361] is AFFIRMED in all respects.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.