Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Dadd v. Anoka County

United States District Court, D. Minnesota

June 24, 2015

PATRICK A. DADD, Plaintiff,
v.
ANOKA COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

Zorislav R. Leyderman, The Law Office of Zorislav R. Leyderman, Counsel for Plaintiff.

Andrew T. Jackola, Anoka County Attorney's Office, Counsel for Defendants.

ORDER

MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge.

The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson dated May 4, 2015. Defendants filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.

The Court has reviewed the records submitted by the parties [Docket Nos. 12, 19] and concludes that the decision not to consider these documents is properly within the Court's discretion. Additionally, even if the Court had considered these documents, the analysis of the motion to dismiss would have remained the same. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thorson dated May 4, 2015.

Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson dated May 4, 2015 [Docket No. 23].
2. Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss the Complaint [Docket No. 10] is DENIED.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.