Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Evans

United States District Court, D. Minnesota

March 17, 2017

United States of America, Plaintiff,
v.
Malcolm Roy Evans, Defendant.

          Thomas M. Hollenhorst, Esq., United States Attorney's Office, Minneapolis, MN, on behalf of Plaintiff.

          Jordan S. Kushner, Esq., Law Office of Jordan S. Kushner, Minneapolis, MN, on behalf of Defendant

          MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

          ANN D. MONTGOMERY U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

         I. INTRODUCTION

         This matter is before the undersigned United States District Judge for a ruling on Defendant Malcolm Roy Evans' (“Evans”) Motion to Terminate AG Custody [Docket No. 128] and Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 129]. The Government has filed a Response [Docket No. 133]. For the reasons set forth below, the Motions are denied.

         II. BACKGROUND

         On June 18, 2015, after a four-day trial, a jury found Evans guilty of offenses stemming from armed bank robbery and carjacking, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113(a), 2113(d), 2119(1), and 2113(e). See Min. Entry [Docket No. 70]. Evans was scheduled to be sentenced on January 26, 2017. See [Docket No. 107]. On January 18, 2017, Evans filed a Motion for Order of Competency to Stand Trial [Docket No. 118], requesting a psychiatric or psychological evaluation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241(b). That request was granted, and Evans was ordered to be transported by the United States Marshal Service to a Bureau of Prisons facility and committed to the custody of the Attorney General. See Order [Docket No. 119]. The January 26, 2017 sentencing hearing was cancelled. See [Docket No. 120]. The day after requesting the evaluation, Evans filed a Motion to Cancel the Competency Evaluation [Docket No. 121]. That motion was denied and the Order of January 26 remained in effect. See Order [Docket No. 124].

         On February 2, 2017, Evans was transported to the Metropolitan Detention Center in Los Angles, California for the evaluation. In a March 3, 2017 letter, the Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center requested a 15-day extension to complete the examination. That request was granted. See Order [Docket No. 131].

         Evans now argues that he should be released from the Attorney General's custody and transported back to Minnesota to receive a competency evaluation from a psychologist or psychiatrist of his choice. Evans also argues that his due process rights have been violated by the length of time between his trial and sentencing. Evans requests that the charges against him be dismissed.

         III. DISCUSSION

         A. Motion to Terminate Custody

         Evans first argues that the Attorney General has failed to arrange for a timely competency evaluation, and he should therefore be permitted to make arrangements to have the evaluation performed by a psychologist of his choosing. This argument has no merit. Evans, who was committed to the custody of the Attorney General for a 30 day period, arrived at the Metropolitan Detention Center on February 2, 2017. In a March 3, 2017 letter, the Warden of that facility requested a 15-day extension to complete the evaluation. Under 18 U.S.C. § 4241(d)(1), the Attorney General is permitted to maintain custody of a defendant for a “reasonable period of time, not to exceed four months.” The time Evans has been in the custody of the Attorney General is reasonable.

         B. Motion to Dismiss

         Evans next argues that the delay between verdict and sentencing has violated his due process rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(b)(1). Evans argues that because of this delay, he has been prejudiced by being confined in a county jail setting that is more restrictive than a federal prison, which ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.