Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

White v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

August 15, 2017

Corey White Plaintiff- Appellant
v.
Union Pacific Railroad Company Defendant-Appellee

          Submitted: May 10, 2017

         Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines

          Before SMITH, Chief Judge, COLLOTON and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

          SMITH, Chief Judge.

         Corey White sued Union Pacific Railroad Company ("Union Pacific") under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq., alleging liability for a lower-back injury. The question we address is whether White's August 2012 suit is time-barred by the three-year FELA statute of limitations. More specifically, should White reasonably have known before August 2009-three years before filing suit-that Union Pacific's rough tracks were injuring his lower back? White, a locomotive engineer for Union Pacific, testified that in 2007 and 2008 he experienced recurring lower-back pain that he attributed to potholes in the tracks, and that this was the same pain for which he later sought medical treatment. Because White should have known about his injury and its cause more than three years before filing suit, the suit is time-barred. We therefore affirm the district court's[1] judgment.

         I. Background

         White first injured his back in a work-related mishap in 1999. As White pulled a work implement for a concrete company, he felt burning and tingling down to his hands and his knees. The injury kept him from working for seven or eight months. His chiropractor "thought maybe there were some dis[c] issues." But White believes that he healed from that injury "[f]or the most part."

         In 2001, White began working for the Iowa Missouri Rail Link (IMRL) as a switchman and conductor.[2] He passed a physical examination and had no back problems while with IMRL. In 2004, White went to work for Union Pacific. He passed a Union Pacific medical exam. He worked as a switchman and conductor from 2004-2006, mostly on the "road" but sometimes in the yard. During this time, White had no back problems.

         In 2006, Union Pacific promoted White from conductor to engineer. Engineers receive better pay and have different responsibilities. As an engineer, White was responsible for the brake and the throttle-in White's words, "the movement of that train." The nature of the engineer's job means that he pays close attention to the feel of the train. "[A]s an engineer, " White said, "you feel these jarring dips and bumps, " which White compared to "a pothole in the street." White noted that an engineer who was not prepared for a pothole would find the contents of his desk in his lap. And when the train would bottom out, "you would feel that through the bottom of the seat into your rump all the way up your back, just a jarring, tingling, sharp pain sensation."

         Beginning in 2007, White worked frequently on the Clinton subdivision-a part of the railroad that runs from Boone, Iowa, to Chicago, Illinois. White's run began at Boone, in central Iowa, and ended at Clinton, on the Illinois border-about 200 miles away. On this run, several trains moved constantly back and forth over two sets of track, making this a high-density traffic section. White considered the Clinton subdivision track to be in the worst condition of any track that he traveled. White testified that during 2007 and 2008, he regularly experienced bottoming-out situations caused by irregularities in the track. The worst ones-which occurred at least once a run-caused him to feel pain in his lower back.

         In 2010, White first saw a doctor for his lower-back pain. After seeing other doctors for further treatment, White left Union Pacific in 2011. In August 2012, he sued Union Pacific under FELA, alleging that its work conditions caused his lower-back injury.

         Union Pacific moved for summary judgment, arguing that White's claim was barred by FELA's three-year statute of limitations. See 45 U.S.C. § 56. Based on White's statement that his pain had gotten progressively worse from 2001 to 2011, Union Pacific argued that his claim accrued in 2001. The district court disagreed.[3] The court noted that White's pain was "sufficiently minimal as late as 2004 that he was cleared by [Union Pacific]'s medical personnel" and that White "did not seek medical treatment until September 2009."[4] The court also noted that White's testimony about his injuries focused on what he knew as of summer 2009. Based on this evidence, the court concluded that a jury must determine, as a factual matter, when White's claim accrued.

         At trial, White testified about his injury and its cause. He affirmed that beginning in 2007 and 2008, at least once every run his train would bottom out on the track. He affirmed that these situations would cause the type of lower-back pain for which he later sought medical treatment. Sometimes this "pretty bad pain" would run into his buttocks and down his leg as a sharp burning sensation. White attributed his pain to these bottoming-out situations-he said that he made this connection in his mind every run, day after day.

         Based on that testimony, the district court granted judgment for Union Pacific as a matter of law, concluding that White's claim accrued before August 2009 and was therefore time-barred. The court noted that "both the record facts and the applicable law ha[d] evolved" since the court had earlier denied Union Pacific's summary judgment motion. White appeals, ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.