United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Original Judgment: 05/29/2013
Previous Amended Judgment 05/30/2013
C. Engh, Defendant's Attorney
ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
R. Tunheim, Judge
motion of [√] the defendant  the Director of the
Bureau of Prisons  the court under 18 U.S.C. §
3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment
imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has
subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United
States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into
account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10
and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. §
3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable, IT
IS ORDERED that the motion is:
DENIED.  GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed
sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the
last judgment issued) of ________________ months
is reduced to _________.
Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)
as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated
05/30/2013 shall remain in effect.
IS SO ORDERED.
COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE
(Prior to Any Departures)
Total Offense Level: _____________ Amended Total Offense
History Category: ____________ Criminal History Category:
Guideline Range: _______to _______months Amended Guideline
Range: ______ to ______months
SENTENCE RELATIVE TO THE ...